According to the Zimbabwe Population Census Report of 2012 (the 2012 Census Report), the total population of Zimbabwe was 13 061 239.1
The 2012 Census Report did not seek to identify the type of the disability but focused on the number of persons with disabilities (PWDs) in a family statistical data on the prevalence of disability in Zimbabwe which was obtained from the Zimbabwe Inter-Censal Demographic Survey of 1997 (the Inter-Censal Survey)2 and the Zimbabwe Housing and Population Census Report (the Housing and Population Report).3
Zimbabwe has had four censuses since attaining independence in 1980. However, none of the censuses provided statistics on the prevalence of disability in the country. Recent studies have estimated the disability prevalence to be 1.4 million of the total population.4
There are no official statistics on the total number and percentage of women with disabilities (WWDs) in Zimbabwe. According to the Inter-Censal Survey, the proportion of male to females with disabilities was 56 and 44 per cent respectively.5 Furthermore, the Housing and Population Report recorded a national disability prevalence of 2,9 per cent of which 45 per cent were men and 55 per cent were women.6
There is no recent statistical data on the total number and percentage of children with disabilities (CWDs) in Zimbabwe. The last comprehensive study on the prevalence of disability amongst children in Zimbabwe was the Inter-Censal Survey. The Survey recorded a total of 218 421 PWDs in the country, which was approximately 2 per cent of the country’s total population.7 Of these, 57 232 were CWDs,8 which was about 26 per cent of the total population of PWDs in 1997. Another study which was conducted by the United Nations Children’s Emergence Fund (UNICEF) in 1997, estimated CWDs to be 150 000.9 Significantly, such disparities on estimates clearly demonstrate the absence of reliable statistics on the prevalence of disability in the country.
Zimbabwe is a state party to the CRPD. Zimbabwe ratified the CRPD and its Optional Protocol on 23 September 2013, thereby becoming the 135th state party to ratify the Convention and its Optional Protocol.11
This section recognizes the inherent dignity and worth of each human being as one of the founding principles upon which Zimbabwe is founded. This provision is of utmost importance in so far as it relates to persons with disabilities.
The Disabled Persons Act (DPA)27 is the primary law that addresses disability in Zimbabwe. This Act provides for the welfare and rehabilitation of PWDs.28 The Act establishes the National Disability Board and sets out the functions of this body.29 The Act creates the Office of Director for Disabled Persons’ Affairs whose duties include liaising with ministries and local authorities to ensure the implementation of the policies and measures formulated by the National Disability Board, and co-ordinating the activities of organisations which are involved in working with PWDs.30 Section 9 of the Act endeavours to protect PWDs from non-discrimination in employment.31 However, this non-discrimination clause is subject to exceptions based on the nature of the job, the nature of disability the prospective employee has, and whether the employer has special facilities to accommodate the PWD.32 The Act makes it a criminal offence to deny PWDs admission into any premises to which members of the public are ordinarily admitted or to deny provision of any public service amenity.33
The Mental Health Act34 provides for the consolidation and amendment of the law relating to the care, detention and after-care of persons with mental disabilities for the purposes of treatment.35 This Act establishes the Mental Hospital Board which has the mandate of rehabilitating, treating and attending to the welfare of ‘mental health patients’.36 The Act stipulates the procedure for the committal of persons with mental disabilities to mental health institutions.37 The committal procedure for persons with mental disabilities who face criminal charges is also provided for by the Act.38 Special Boards are established by the Act. The Boards report on the condition of ‘mental patients’ detained in the various mental health institutions.39 The Mental Health Review Tribunal is also constituted by the Act. This Board hears applications and appeals made by and on behalf of ‘mental health patients’ detained in mental health institutions regarding their treatment, general welfare and release.40
The State Services (Disability Benefits) Act41 provides for monetary compensation on the death or disablement of a state official arising out and in the course of duty.42 This includes members of the Defence Force, the Police Force and the Prison Services. The Act further provides for compensation on the death or disablement of any person whilst assisting the mentioned forces.43 The Act appears to make reference to physical disabilities only and does not mention other types of disabilities such as mental, intellectual or sensory disabilities.44 Disablement is defined in terms of this Act as permanent injury or disfigurement.45
The Social Welfare Assistance Act46 provides for the granting of social welfare assistance to persons in need and their dependants.47 PWDs in Zimbabwe have been identified as the worst affected by poverty.48 In determining whether a person is eligible to receive social welfare assistance in terms of this Act, considerations laid out in section 6 of the Act are taken into account.49 Persons who are ‘handicapped mentally or physically’ and persons who are ‘destitute’, ‘indigent’ and ‘incapable of looking after themselves’ are eligible to receive social welfare assistance.50 The Act endeavours to assist PWDs by providing social welfare assistance in the various forms laid out in section 5 of the Act.51 The Department of Social Welfare in the Ministry of Public Service, Labour and Social Welfare has the mandate to provide this social welfare assistance. However, this government department is poorly resourced and funded. It does not have the requisite resources and capacity to alleviate the poverty of PWDs. This department has been described as ‘probably the most demoralized of all government departments’.52
The War Victims Compensation Act53 provides for the payment of compensation to persons who have been disabled as a result of war. Where a person has been disabled as a result of war, they are entitled to claim compensation in terms of this Act. Compensation is paid after an assessment of the degree of disablement by the Commissioner of War Victims Compensation.54 This Act has special provisions for women with disabilities and children with disabilities in the context of disabilities caused by war.55 The Act provides for increased monetary compensation for women with disabilities.56 It also makes provision for educational allowance for children who acquire disabilities as a result of war.57 This allowance is also available to children whose parents have been disabled as a result of war.58 However, the Act appears to make reference to physical disability only.59 It can be submitted that persons who acquire physical disabilities as a result of war are the only persons who are entitled to receive compensation under the Act.
The Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act62 provides for the trial procedures of persons with mental disabilities.63 Where a magistrate or judge in the trial of a person with a mental disability has been presented with evidence to the effect that the accused person had a mental disability at the time of committing the offence, a special verdict to the effect that the person is not guilty by reason of insanity can be entered. The magistrate may order the detention of such person in a mental institution for the purposes of treatment. Where the magistrate is presented with evidence to the effect that the accused person is no longer mentally disordered, he can be released from prison.64
There is generally a dearth of jurisprudence on disability rights in the Zimbabwean legal system. Nevertheless, the milestone ruling in the case of Simon Mvindi v The President of the Republic of Zimbabwe 65 which addressed the right to vote of PWDs. During the 2008 elections, ballot papers were not available in accessible format to PWDs. Sections 59 and 60 of the Electoral Act66 required polling officers on duty to assist voters in need of assistance especially PWDs to cast their ballot. In Simon Mvindi, the applicants were all persons with visual impairments who brought a Constitutional Court application challenging the constitutionality of sections 59 and 60 of the Electoral Act. The applicants cited a violation of the right to a secret ballot by the sections in question. The Court held that PWDs have a right to vote in secrecy like any other person. The Court further declared the sections in question null and void as they violated the applicants’ right to a secret ballot. The Court also directed the government to provide voting materials in accessible format so that PWDs could fully exercise their right to vote in secrecy. 67
The government has not formulated meaningful policies that directly address disability. It is important to note that civil society is far more involved in carrying out programmes and implementing policies that address the needs of PWDs. As indicated above, the DPA establishes the National Disability Board, which is tasked with developing measures and policies on the welfare of PWDs. In 2005, the National Disability Board successfully lobbied for the inclusion of disability as a prohibited ground of discrimination in the Constitution. Physical disability was then included as a prohibited ground of discrimination.68 The National Disability Board further established the Disability Fund in 2003 and received funding for this
In 2004, the country’s first national mental health policy was launched.71 The aim of this policy was to provide a framework for the design, monitoring and evaluation of mental health programmes. However, delays in implementation and budget constraints made the implementation of this policy difficult.72
The office of the Special Advisor on Disability and Rehabilitation to the President and Cabinet was established in 2007.73 This office acts as a central point within government for matters relating to disability.74 It also coordinates the annual National Disability Expo which was launched in 2013. The purpose of this Expo is to provide a platform for government, civil society and any other relevant stakeholders involved with PWDs to interact and share their experiences. The Expo also serves to raise awareness on the rights of PWDs.75
In 2009, the Government launched the Short-Term Emergency Recovery Program (STERP). STERP focused on stabilising the economy. This policy indirectly addressed disability as it provided financial support to revitalise the disability allowance.76 The Medium Term Plan (MTP) was Zimbabwe’s national economic and development strategy from the period 2011 to 2015.77 This policy indirectly addressed disability as it provided for the issuing of grants to PWDs facilities. However, this national policy did not address the economic empowerment of PWDs or income generation initiatives for PWDs.78 However, the implementation of the MTP was shortened by the demise of the government of national unity in 2013.
The DPA establishes the National Disability Board (NDB).79 The functions of the board are set out in section 5 of the Act. The NDB is mandated with formulating policies that are tailored to achieve equal opportunities for PWDs by ensuring that they obtain education and employment. The NDB is also tasked with ensuring that PWDs participate fully in sporting, recreational and cultural activities and that they are afforded full access to community and social services.
The Board is further empowered in terms of the DPA to issue adjustment orders.80 Adjustment orders issued by the NDB seek to ensure that PWDs have access to mainstream public services and premises. Where the NDB considers that any public premise or service is inaccessible to PWDs, it may serve an adjustment order. The adjustment order serves as a direction to the owner of the building or the provider of the service to ensure that there is reasonable access by PWDs. The owner or provider must effect such changes so as to ensure reasonable access by PWDs at his/her own expense.81 Section 7(8) of the DPA makes it a criminal offence not to comply with an adjustment order.
The NDB is however prohibited from issuing adjustment orders on any public institution without the consent of the Minister responsible for the institution. It can be submitted that requiring ministerial consent renders adjustment of state premises and services dependant on the political willingness of the government.82 Though the Act empowers the NDB to issue adjustment orders and criminalises non-compliance, no adjustment orders have ever been issued in terms of this Act.83 Furthermore, there have been no prosecutions in terms of this Act.84 The NDB is also hindered in its operations by lack of resources.85
In Zimbabwe, the Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission is established in terms of section 242 of the Constitution. Its functions include promoting awareness and respect for human rights and freedoms at all levels of society; promoting the protection, development and attainment of human rights and freedoms; monitoring, assessing and ensuring observance of human rights and freedoms; and receiving and considering complaints from the public and taking action with regard to the complaints it receives.86
The Commission is also mandated to protect the public against abuse of power and maladministration by the state and public institutions and by officers of public institutions. In addition, the Commission recommends to Parliament effective measures to promote human rights and freedoms. The Commission may also direct the Commissioner-General of Police to investigate cases of suspected criminal violations of human rights or freedoms and to report to the Commission on the results of such investigations.87
Furthermore, the Commission may also investigate complaints or allegations of human rights violations on its own initiative.88 As such, the Commission is empowered to visit and inspect prisons, places of detention, refugee camps and related facilities for the purposes of identifying and redressing cases of human rights violations in such places. With regard to disability rights, the Commission is empowered to visit and inspect places where ‘mentally disordered’ or ‘intellectually handicapped’ persons are detained.89
Although the constitutional mandate of the Commission appears to be well articulated on paper, serious questions remain with regard to the Commission’s ability to take measures against the executive arm of government, especially human rights violations by the police. It appears that the Commission is a weak body that cannot effectively address human rights violations in Zimbabwe. The recommendations or reports by the Commission with regard to human rights violations have no legal force, although the responsible authorities are expected to act on them. Furthermore, from its inception in 2009, the Commission is financially starved and therefore cannot adequately or effectively execute its mandate.90
The National Association for the Care of the Handicapped (NASCOH)92 is an umbrella organisation that deals with disability in Zimbabwe. Its members include most if not all the organisations listed in 9.1 above. Other member organisations include Abilities, the Disability Agenda Forum, the Disability Resource Centre, the Disabled Child Network, the Disabled Helping Hand Association, the Disablement Association of Zimbabwe and the Zimbabwe Visually Impaired Teachers Trade Union. The objectives of NASCOH include: initiating, promoting and developing the coordination and participation of and between member organisations in matters concerning the care of people with disabilities; periodically reviewing the facilities available for the rehabilitation of people with disabilities in order to promote further developments; and advising the government on any existing or future organisation concerned with the care of people with disabilities and to disseminate information to any interested body.
The Department is responsible for disability issues. It is tasked with the provision of disability grants to PWDs. The Department however is not human-rights oriented in its work but approaches disability as a welfare issue. In addition, the Department ‘is probably the most impoverished and demoralized of all government departments’.93 Due to a lack of financial resources, the Department is not in a position to provide meaningful grants. At present, only a few PWDs are receiving the disability grants in the amount of US$17-00 per month.94 It is submitted that the size of the grant is very small and insignificant.
As indicated above, the Board is established by the DPA.95 Its functions are to adopt policies to ensure access to education and employment by PWDs.96 It also ensures that PWDs participate fully in sporting, recreation and cultural activities and are afforded full access to community and social services. Is is the Board that issues the above discussed adjustment orders in the event that there are inaccessible public premises and services.97
However, the Board is largely invisible due to a lack of resources in that it operates under the financially ailing Department of Social Welfare. The Board has not had an office to operate from since 1992 and there are no meetings by the members due to lack of resources.98
Disability in Zimbabwe is surrounded by myths resulting in stigmatisation of PWDs.99 Pejorative terms like ‘idiots’, ‘imbeciles’, ‘mentally retarded’ or ‘mentally handicapped’ are still used in Zimbabwe to refer to persons with mental and intellectual disability.100 Disability is linked to witchcraft and sometimes the birth of a child with a disability may result in divorce of the mother. There is also a common misconception in Zimbabwe that PWDs are passive and economically unproductive, and therefore are a burden upon the country.101 The negative social attitudes thus negatively affect the inclusion and participation of PWDs as equal members of society. Resultantly, PWDs tend to suffer more human rights violations compared to their non-disabled counterparts.102
The legal framework that addresses the right of access to physical, social communication, information and other services is weak. As indicated above, the National Disability Board cannot issue and serve adjustment orders to state hospitals, clinics, nursing homes, schools or educational training centres without the consent of the relevant Minister of the institution concerned.103 The requirement for ministerial consent has resulted in many government workplaces and state recreational facilities not being accessible to PWDs104 because the required ministerial consent is very difficult to secure. There are no accessibility standards and regulations for public premises and services in Zimbabwe. As a result, roads, bus stations, communication services, transport services and recreational services are not accessible to PWDs in Zimbabwe.105
It has been estimated that one in three children with disabilities is not attending school and that 75 per cent of children with disabilities never complete primary school.106 These are damning reports for a country striving to achieve the millennium development goal of universal primary education. It has also been indicated that 32 per cent of people with disabilities in Zimbabwe have had no schooling.107 This is particularly disturbing if one considers the central role that education plays in fostering the enjoyment of other rights and promoting the development of children, communities and nations. To compound the situation of learners with disabilities in Zimbabwe, section 83 of the Constitution reinforces the idea of special schools for PWDs and does not do enough to embrace inclusive education.108 Without educational opportunities, children with disabilities will not have the chance to develop to their full potential and will face tremendous barriers to full social and economic participation in society. Without the requisite education, a vicious cycle of poverty and disability is therefore created and compounded for children with disabilities in Zimbabwe. The law does not address the right to education for children with disabilities in Zimbabwe.109
Given the fact that Zimbabwe is currently facing unprecendented economic challenges, PWDs are excluded from employment.110 The law is inadequate with regards to the right to employment for PWDs. The laws that address disability in Zimbabwe have a lot of shortcomings with regard to the realisation of the right to employment of PWDs. The laws still embrace an outdated welfaristic approach or medical approach to disability.111
To start with, the Constitution does not confer any right to employment for PWDs nor does it confer any state obligation to safeguard and promote such right.112 The DPA does not help either. Apart from merely prohibiting discrimination against PWDs in employment,113 the Act does not confer any right of substance in relation to employment of PWDs. The Act is also not a human rights document and embraces the medical approach to disability as opposed to a robust human rights-approach.114 On its part, the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01] does not help either. In a similar fashion to the DPA, the Labour Act merely protects employees against discrimination on the basis of disability but does not give an obligation upon the state to promote, protect and fulfil the right to employment.115 The government has also done little to ensure the effective implementation of the laws. It is not surprising to note that, over and above the high rates of unemployment in Zimbabwe, PWDs are the worst affected.116
The Constitution subjects the realisation of the right to health for PWDs to the availability of state resources.117 Given that the right to health is most important to PWDs, the law in Zimbabwe is inadequate in this regard. The Constitution does not underscore the state’s obligation to ensure progressive realisation of the right.118 PWDs, especially those in rural areas, are the most affected with regard to inaccessible health care services. As such, there is no legal mechanism to compel government to ensure full and effective access to health care services by PWDs in Zimbabwe.
Prior to 2008, PWDs who needed assistance in casting ballots during an election were assisted by police officers, Zimbabwe Electoral Commission members and political party representatives. However, the position was challenged in Simon Mvindi.119 After making a finding that a myriad of factors like lack of accessible polling stations, lack of voting materials in accessible formats, lack of accessible campaign literature and inaccessible transportation to and from polling stations renders the right to vote by PWDs hollow, the Supreme Court (sitting as a Constitutional Court) found that PWDs have a right to vote in secret like any other person. Political parties and the government, through the electoral authority, were ordered to consider developing political communications and voting materials in sign language and ballot papers in large print or Braille.
Despite the judgment, political participation by PWDs in Zimbabwe is still weak due to inaccessible polling stations especially in rural areas, limited number of PWD candidates during elections120 and lack of accessible voting materials.
Basically, the major weakness in Zimbabwe is that laws make the realisation of socio-economic and cultural rights for PWDs contingent upon resources that are available to the state and do not underscore the state’s duty to ensure progressive realisation of such rights.
Although women with disabilities (WWDs) generally face the same spectrum of human rights abuses that the able-bodied women face, their abuses are magnified due to severe dependence and social isolation. They suffer double discrimination.121 In Zimbabwe, the situation of WWDs is particularly precarious. They are subjected to harassment, sexual abuse and exploitation. In addition, Zimbabwe being a highly patriarchal society, WWDs are less likely to benefit from any developmental initiatives that are available as compared to men with disabilities.
On their part, children with disabilities are doubly marginalised, firstly as children and secondly as PWDs. Children with disabilities are particularly vulnerable. There is need to ensure that their rights and welfare are protected in Zimbabwe. A common scenario in Zimbabwe is that children with disabilities are less likely to complete primary school education compared to their non-disabled counterparts. This results in spill over effects in that due to a lack of education and requisite skills, it is difficult if not impossible for children with disabilities to secure any form of employment. At the end, a vicious cycle of poverty and disability is created and compounded.
Not only are women and children with disabilities in need of concerted attention but also elderly people with disabilities. Needs of elderly people with disabilities may largely differ from those of women and children with disabilities. This means that the equal treatment of all PWDs without taking into account the specific individual circumstances may also lead to injustice.
Firstly, Zimbabwe needs to urgently domesticate the CRPD for the treaty to have local applicability. Zimbabwe is a dual legal system and all international treaties ratified have to be domesticated.122
Secondly, there is need to align the disability laws with the Constitution and more importantly the CRPD. This is again an urgent exercise which should be implemented without any hurdles. It is a cause of concern that laws which address disability in Zimbabwe, with the exception of the Constitution, predate the CRPD and are framed along the outdated medical model of disability which treats PWDs as sick people in need of medical treatment and charity. As an example, the DPAis not a human rights document in that it does not confer any rights on PWDs or confer any obligations on the state.
Other laws that are in need of the alignment process include the Children’s Act [Chapter 5:06], the Mental Health Act [Chapter 15:12], the Social Welfare Act [Chapter 17:06], the State Service (Disability Benefits) Act [Chapter 16:05], the War Victims Compensation Act [Chapter 11: 16] and the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. The bulk of these laws still use pejorative terms that disempower rather than empower PWDs. Terms like ‘imbecile,’ ‘mentally disordered,’ ‘intellectually handicapped’ and ‘mental patients’ demean, degrade, belittle, stigmatise and devalue PWDs.
Thirdly, it is an opportunity for Zimbabwe to adopt a National Policy on Disability. A national policy is very important with regard to implementation of disability laws. Such a policy should also consider groups of PWDs who face double discrimination for example women and children with disabilities, and the elderly with disabilities.
Fourthly, there is need to take affirmative action programmes in favour of PWDs. Section 56(6) of the Constitution provides for affirmative action. Affirmative action simply means targeted steps for the advancement of people disadvantaged by historical practices or injustices. It is common cause that PWDs are a group of people who have suffered historical marginalisation due to discriminatory practices and tendencies.
A genuinely equal society is one that has a positive approach to accommodating human difference. Formal equality entrenches pre-existing patterns of social disadvantage in a number of fundamental ways and fails to ‘reasonably accommodate’ the difference of disability. Formal equality therefore creates illusory benefits for PWDs. Thus, there should be affirmative action policies in Zimbabwe laying a firm foundation for the increased participation of PWDs in critical sectors like education, employment, health and politics. Zimbabwe therefore has to take affirmative action in favour of groups marginalised on the basis of gender, age, disability or any other reason created by history, tradition or custom, for the purpose of redressing imbalances which exist against them.
Fifthly, there is need to increase the number of senators representing PWDs from the current two senators. Such a move will assist in guaranteeing effective parliamentary representation of PWDs in Zimbabwe
Sixthly, there is need for increased litigious and non-litigious efforts for the development of domestic jurisprudence on disability. Courts of law play a very crucial role with regard to the realisation of the rights of PWDs. More referrals are therefore needed on disability issues to the courts of law so as to provide an impetus for the development of domestic jurisprudence on disability.
In addition to litigation, the Constitution and other laws can also be enforced through non-litigious means such as citizens lobbying and pressurising the government to give effect to their rights. Commissions, for example, the above-mentioned Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission can be approached whenever there is violation of the rights of PWDs.
1. See the Zimbabwe Population Census 2012: National Report, available at: http://www. zimstat.co.zw/dmdocuments/Census/CensusResults2012/National_Report.pdf (accessed 7 April 2014).
2. Zimbabwe Inter-Censal Demographic Survey Report of 1997, available at: http://www. childinfo.org/files/ZIM finalest.pdf (accessed 4 June 2014).
3. Zimbabwe Housing and Population Census Report of 2002, available at: http://www. zimstat.co.zw/dmdocumets/Census/Census.pdf (accessed 3 June 2014).
4. See T Choruma The forgotten tribe: Persons with disabilities in Zimbabwe (2007), available at: http://www.africacampaign.info/uploads/media/forgottribeprogressiozim_01.pdf (accessed 5 April 2014).
9. UNICEF ‘A study of children and adolescents with disabilities in Zimbabwe’, available at: http://www.unicef.org/evaldatabase/files/ZIM_01-803 . pdf (accessed 17 June 2014).
11. See the United States International Council on Disabilities’ (USICD) data portal, available at: http://www.usicd.org/index.cfm/news_zimbabwe-becomes-135th-state-party-to-ratify-the-crpd (accessed 9 April 2014).
14. See the country’s reporting history and status available at: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/TreatyBodyExternal/MasterCalendar.aspx (accessed 5 April 2014).
15. The Ministry of Public Service, Labour and Social Welfare is the Ministry responsible for disability issues in Zimbabwe whereas the Ministry of Justice and Legal Affairs is the Ministry responsible for the country’s report process under the United Nations Universal Periodic Review (UPR).
17. See the 2012 Foreign and Commonwealth Office Report on Human Rights and Democracy, available at: http://www.hrdreport.fco.gov.uk/human-rights-in-countries-of-concern/zimbabwe (accessed 8 April 2014).
18. See the Resident Coordinator’s Statement on the follow up workshop to Zimbabwe’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process, available at: http://www.zw.one.un.org/newsroom/news/rcs-statement-follow-workshop-zimbabwe%E2%80%99s-universal-periodic-review-upr-process (accessed 9 April 2014).
26. This is a dedicated section on the rights of PWDs in Zimbabwe. This section clearly demonstrates that Zimbabwe now subscribes to the human rights approach with regards to disability. This is a paradigm shift from the outdated medical model of disability. The medical model of disability treats PWDs as objects of welfare whereas the human rights model treats PWDs as holders of rights who should enjoy their rights on a par with their non-impaired counterparts.
44. E Mandipa ‘A critical analysis of the legal and institutional frameworks for the realisation of the rights of persons with disabilities in Zimbabwe’ (2013) 1 African Disability Rights Yearbook 88. Also see sec 15 and the First Schedule of the Act which only outlines the degrees of physical disablement that will be considered before compensation is payable.
48. National Association of Societies for the Care of the Handicapped ‘Disability in Zimbabwe’ available at: http://www.nascoh.org.zw/?Pageid=82 (accessed 2 April 2014).
49. Section 6 provides that the Director of Social Welfare may grant social welfare assistance to a destitute or indigent person where he/she is satisfied that such person is over sixty years of age, is handicapped physically or mentally, suffers continuous ill-health, is a dependant of a person who is a destitute or indigent or incapable of looking after himself or herself, or otherwise has need of social welfare assistance.
52. King George VI School and Center for Children with Physical Disabilities ‘Disability in Zimbabwe’, available at: https://sites.google.com/a/kinggeorge6.org/kgvi/Home/the-centre/disability-in-zimbabwe (accessed 2 April 2014).
‘If at any time after the commencement of any criminal trial it is alleged or appears that the accused is not of sound mind, or if on such a trial the defence is set up that the accused was not criminally responsible on the ground of mental disorder or defect for the act or omission alleged to constitute the offence with which he is charged, he shall be dealt with in the manner provided by the Mental Health Act [Chapter 15:06].’
69. R Lang & G Charowa ‘DFID scoping study: Disability issues in Zimbabwe’ (July 2007) 31, available at: http:// www.ucl.ac.uk/lc-ccr/downloads/scopingstudies/dfid_zimbabwereport (accessed 4 April 2014).
71. ‘Zimbabwe: Mental health policy launched’ IRIN (undated), available at: http://www.irinnews.org/report/52472/zimbabwe-mental-health-policy-launched (accessed 4 February 2014).
72. Zimbabwe Association of Doctors for Human Rights ‘Enjoyment of the right to the highest attainable standard of health by all Zimbabweans’ , available at: http://www.zadhr.org/newsletters/77-zadhr-newsletter-volume-7-issue-3-august-2009.html?start=3 (accessed 3 April 2014).
75. ‘Disability expo set for next month’ The Herald 26 June 2013, available at: http://www.herald.co.zw/disability-expo-set-for-next-month/ (accessed 4 March 2014).
76. SA Nilsson ‘Disability Rights in Zimbabwe’, available at: http://www.msc.st/docs/HRBA-Disability-Zimbabwe-revised-2011-01-30.doc (accessed 3 April 2014).
90. ‘Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission pleads for funding’ SW Radio Africa 23 May 2013, available at: http://www.swradioafrica.com/2013/05/23/zimbabwe-human-rights-commission-pleads-for-funding/ (accessed 10 April 2014).
91. The list of DPOs and other civil organisations that deal with disability in Zimbabwe is available at: http://www.nascoh.org.zw/members (accessed 24 June 2014).
100. See the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act (n 62 above) and the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act (n 60) in which pejorative terms like the ‘mentally challenged’ and ‘imbecile’ are still used.
104. AH Eide et al ‘Living conditions among people with activity limitations in Zimbabwe: A representative regional survey’, available at: http://www.safod.org/images/lczimbabwe.pdf (accessed 4 March 2014).
110. Zimbabwe Human Rights Report ‘Discrimination based on race, sex, religion, disability, language, or social status’, available at: http://www.ncbuy.com/reference/country/humanrights. html?code=zi&sec=5 (accessed 7 June 2014).
121. SA Djoyou Kamga ‘The rights of women with disabilities in Africa: Does the Protocol on the Rights of Women in Africa offer any hope’ (2011) Barbara Faye Waxman Fiduccia Papers on Women and Girls with Disabilities, Center for Women Policy Studies 3.